An Introduction to EMDR Therapy

Ally Wolf, MSW -

Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) therapy is an innovative approach to treating trauma and anxiety disorders that has gained significant recognition in recent years. Rooted in the understanding of how the brain processes traumatic memories, EMDR offers a hopeful pathway for individuals seeking relief from the burdens of their past.

Important note: This article is intended for educational purposes, not personal clinical advice. If you have symptoms of PTSD/depression/anxiety that are unmanaged or worsening, please reach out to your healthcare provider.

Subscribe: All profits donated to student scholarships!

Statistical Insights and Efficacy

Numerous studies have underscored the efficacy of EMDR therapy. A meta-analysis by Watts et al. (2013) found that EMDR is an effective treatment for PTSD, with effect sizes comparable to those of cognitive-behavioral interventions. In a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, Bisson et al. (2007) found that the effectiveness of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing was generally supported and suggested EMDR as a first-line therapy for PTSD alongside Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, however, the evidence was limited in terms of the number of trials and the confidence around clinical benefit.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has endorsed EMDR as a recommended treatment for PTSD, citing its effectiveness and efficiency. The therapy’s ability to produce rapid results is especially appealing, often requiring fewer sessions compared to traditional therapy modalities.

What is EMDR Therapy?

Developed by Francine Shapiro in the late 1980s, EMDR is a structured therapy that helps clients process distressing memories and emotions through a series of guided eye movements. The core premise is that trauma can lead to the improper storage of memories, resulting in ongoing psychological distress. EMDR aims to facilitate adaptive processing, allowing individuals to integrate these memories in a healthier way.

The EMDR protocol involves eight phases:

  1. History Taking: Assessing the client's history and identifying target memories.
  2. Preparation: Explaining the EMDR process and establishing a safe environment.
  3. Assessment: Identifying the negative beliefs associated with the target memory.
  4. Desensitization: Engaging in bilateral stimulation while recalling the memory.
  5. Installation: Fostering positive beliefs to replace negative ones.
  6. Body Scan: Identifying and processing any residual physical tension.
  7. Closure: Returning to a state of equilibrium.
  8. Re-evaluation: Assessing progress in subsequent sessions.

During the Desensitization stage, a therapist guides the client to focus on a specific traumatic memory while simultaneously engaging in bilateral stimulation, or BLS. This process has been shown to reduce the emotional charge of the memory and can lead to significant improvements in symptoms of PTSD and other trauma-related conditions.

Bilateral stimulation (BLS) is a core component of EMDR therapy, facilitating the processing of traumatic memories. The choice of bilateral stimulation method often depends on individual client needs, preferences, and the specific context of their trauma. By employing various forms of BLS, therapists can enhance the effectiveness of EMDR, making it a flexible and adaptive treatment option. This adaptability accommodates different client preferences and abilities, and ensures that the therapy can be customized for optimal therapeutic outcomes.

Here are the primary types of bilateral stimulation used in EMDR:

1. Eye Movements

This is the most well-known form of BLS. During a session, the therapist guides the client to follow their finger or an object moving back and forth across their field of vision. The rhythmic nature of these eye movements is believed to help the brain process memories more effectively, similar to the way it does during REM sleep.

2. Tactile Stimulation

In cases where eye movements are not suitable (e.g., clients with certain disabilities or severe dissociation), tactile stimulation can be used. This involves alternating taps on the client’s hands or knees, or the use of devices that provide rhythmic pulses to both sides of the body. These tactile sensations serve to create a similar bilateral processing effect as eye movements.

3. Auditory Stimulation

Auditory BLS involves the use of sounds or tones presented alternately to the left and right ears. This can be achieved through headphones that alternate sounds or through the therapist's voice guiding the client. Some practitioners use rhythmic beats or tones to create a calming environment while promoting bilateral processing.

4. Kinesthetic Stimulation

This form incorporates movements, such as having clients engage in specific body movements that alternate sides, like tapping their feet or hands in a rhythmic pattern. This method can be particularly useful for clients who prefer a more active form of stimulation.

5. Combined Modalities

Some therapists may integrate multiple forms of BLS within a single session, tailoring the approach to the client’s preferences and needs. For example, a therapist might use eye movements during part of the session and then switch to tactile or auditory stimulation based on the client’s response.

Clinical Applications

EMDR is primarily indicated for individuals suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Clinicians often consider EMDR when clients have not responded adequately to traditional therapies, such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) or pharmacological interventions. Beyond PTSD, EMDR is being applied in various clinical contexts. Research suggests its utility in treating:

  • Complex PTSD: Effective for individuals with prolonged exposure to various traumas.
  • Anxiety Disorders: Helping clients manage anxiety through trauma processing.
  • Depression: Addressing underlying traumas that may contribute to depressive symptoms.
  • Phobias: Reducing fear responses linked to traumatic experiences.

The versatility of EMDR makes it a valuable tool in the therapeutic toolbox, catering to a wide array of mental health challenges.

Training Standards and Treatment Fidelity in EMDR Therapy

As EMDR therapy gains popularity, the importance of training standards and treatment fidelity becomes increasingly vital. Effective EMDR practice relies heavily on therapists being well-trained in the specific techniques and protocols of the method. Professional organizations, such as the EMDR International Association (EMDRIA), provide certification programs that ensure therapists undergo rigorous training, including supervised practice, to master the nuances of EMDR.

However, not all practitioners may adhere to the same standards or levels of training, which can lead to inconsistencies that may impact the effectiveness of the therapy and the overall experience for clients. For instance, a therapist who skips critical phases of the EMDR protocol or doesn’t fully grasp the intricacies of bilateral stimulation might inadvertently compromise the treatment’s outcomes.

To enhance treatment fidelity, ongoing education and supervision are essential. Therapists are encouraged to participate in refresher courses and peer consultations to stay updated on best practices and to discuss complex cases. Additionally, research has shown that fidelity to the EMDR protocol is linked to better clinical outcomes, reinforcing that the more closely a therapist follows the established guidelines, the more effective the therapy tends to be.

By maintaining high standards in training and practice, therapists can optimize the healing journey for their clients and ensure that EMDR remains a trusted and effective option for trauma recovery. When looking for an EMDR therapist, it’s always a good idea to ask about their training and experience—after all, you wouldn’t want just anyone taking the wheel on your healing journey!

Considerations

Despite its successes, EMDR is not without its controversies. Critics often question the theoretical foundations of the bilateral stimulation component, arguing that the efficacy may lie more in the therapeutic relationship and cognitive processing. Some therapists express concerns about re-traumatization through the intensity of emotions that can surface during sessions.

While EMDR therapy is generally considered safe and effective, it's important to acknowledge that it may not be suitable for everyone. Some clients might experience heightened emotional distress during sessions as they confront painful memories, leading to temporary feelings of overwhelm or anxiety. Additionally, individuals with certain dissociative disorders or severe mental health issues may find the process challenging without proper support. It’s essential for practitioners to conduct thorough assessments before starting EMDR to ensure it’s the right fit and to provide a safe environment. As with any therapeutic approach, open communication about experiences and feelings during the process is key—so if something feels off, it’s always best to speak up!

EMDR therapy stands as a beacon of hope for those grappling with the shadows of trauma. Its ability to facilitate profound healing in relatively short periods is a testament to its innovative approach. As research continues to affirm its efficacy and as practitioners refine their skills, EMDR is poised to become a cornerstone in the landscape of trauma treatment, opening new doors to resilience and recovery.

References

  • Bisson JI, Ehlers A, Matthews R, Pilling S, Richards D, Turner S. Psychological treatments for chronic post-traumatic stress disorder. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2007 Feb;190:97-104. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.021402. PMID: 17267924.
  • Watts, B. V., Schnurr, P. P., Mayo, L., et al. (2013). "Meta-analysis of the efficacy of treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder." Journal of Traumatic Stress, 26(6), 674-681.
  • EMDR International Association

*Information presented on RxTeach does not represent the opinion of any specific company, organization, or team other than the authors themselves. No patient-provider relationship is created.